Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
A funny thing happened, I’m in the midst of repairing a Mesa Boogie 295 dual power amp.
In another thread I talk about my findings and update the circuit diagram.
https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=36878
I didn’t replace the filter caps as there is so many of them and I’m not experiencing hum. The only caps I decided to replace were the IC filter caps in the bias.
Firstly, I consider these to be the most important caps in the circuit and secondly they are relatively cheap.
I wasn’t expecting any audible difference and typically I would put this down to conformational bias. However, the amp sounded better and I heard a greater volume difference between “class A” and simuclass (better known as extended class A).
I don’t think I should have heard any difference at all, particularly as these caps are used in the bias supply. I also measured the old IC caps in circuit with my ESR70 and they measured fine.
https://www.peakelec.co.uk/acatalog/esr ... meter.html
In the past I used an old Sprague cap tester which measured cap value, ESR, power factor, leakage, and insulation, while the ESR70 measures value and ESR.
https://youtu.be/vaQptqb-KNM?si=ynSevzC-xTyLxaoU
https://people.ohio.edu/postr/bapix/CapChkrs.htm
What do you think would account for the difference in timbre before and after replacing the caps or do you think my original thought that it’s conformational bias sound right?
The amp was markedly different brighter and more lively, it wasn’t something subtle.
Thanks for your time and input.
In another thread I talk about my findings and update the circuit diagram.
https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=36878
I didn’t replace the filter caps as there is so many of them and I’m not experiencing hum. The only caps I decided to replace were the IC filter caps in the bias.
Firstly, I consider these to be the most important caps in the circuit and secondly they are relatively cheap.
I wasn’t expecting any audible difference and typically I would put this down to conformational bias. However, the amp sounded better and I heard a greater volume difference between “class A” and simuclass (better known as extended class A).
I don’t think I should have heard any difference at all, particularly as these caps are used in the bias supply. I also measured the old IC caps in circuit with my ESR70 and they measured fine.
https://www.peakelec.co.uk/acatalog/esr ... meter.html
In the past I used an old Sprague cap tester which measured cap value, ESR, power factor, leakage, and insulation, while the ESR70 measures value and ESR.
https://youtu.be/vaQptqb-KNM?si=ynSevzC-xTyLxaoU
https://people.ohio.edu/postr/bapix/CapChkrs.htm
What do you think would account for the difference in timbre before and after replacing the caps or do you think my original thought that it’s conformational bias sound right?
The amp was markedly different brighter and more lively, it wasn’t something subtle.
Thanks for your time and input.
Last edited by Mark on Mon Feb 12, 2024 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yours Sincerely
Mark Abbott
Mark Abbott
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
Did you happen to compare your pre- and post-replacement bias voltages/cathode currents? I'd bet you altered the bias setting when you changed the caps.
Just plug it in, man.
-
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:04 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
Definitely a point if consideration …but this all echoes another thread currently happening discussing the sonic qualities of different filter caps . I find the effects of these changes not subtle at all, in fact I consider the bias caps as very important for defining the entire feel and timbre of any amplifier .
What brand did you replace the IC cap with ?
Charlie
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
I replaced them with Vishay caps. Vishay bought up a lot of companies and makes components for many brands. I would have preferred Nichicon, but Vishay was all that I could get locally.
https://au.rs-online.com/web/p/aluminiu ... 45379?gb=s
https://au.rs-online.com/web/p/aluminiu ... 45379?gb=s
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Yours Sincerely
Mark Abbott
Mark Abbott
-
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:04 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
2 others liked this
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
Those Vishay are noticeably upper midrange forward sounding , good for Marshall crunch , lots of harmonics . I really like that brand for the bias specifically.
Charlie
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
I also like them for bias (and many other things). the 10uf bias cap affects sound. they do have that british sound that is perfect for marshalls, Voxes, wreck expresses etcWhopperPlate wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:48 am Those Vishay are noticeably upper midrange forward sounding , good for Marshall crunch , lots of harmonics . I really like that brand for the bias specifically.
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
How did you determine that Charlie?WhopperPlate wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:48 am Those Vishay are noticeably upper midrange forward sounding , good for Marshall crunch , lots of harmonics . I really like that brand for the bias specifically.
I had issues with the highs in my Mesa Boogie SOB which I converted to a Mark 1. The fix was to get rid of silver mica caps and use ceramic caps. In a lot of amps I would prefer silver mica, but in this amp ceramic sounded better.
Yours Sincerely
Mark Abbott
Mark Abbott
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
I checked out the bias today and it was much as muchness. I found the EL-34’s were conducting less and the 6L6’s were conducting more. So it’s a bit of a mystery.
I adjusted the bias and it made little difference to the timbre of the amp.
Yours Sincerely
Mark Abbott
Mark Abbott
-
- Posts: 1054
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:04 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
2 others liked this
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
My earsMark wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 8:49 amHow did you determine that Charlie?WhopperPlate wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:48 am Those Vishay are noticeably upper midrange forward sounding , good for Marshall crunch , lots of harmonics . I really like that brand for the bias specifically.
I have swapped these capacitors in many amps many times for fun , for repair , and for plenty of tone tail chasing.
I do remember the first time I noticed when I made such a change about 15 years ago. I wasn’t expecting anything but a properly functioning amplifier, but when I tested the thing suddenly I had an amplifier that was far more musical and easier to play than before the swap. My band mate was playing the amp at the time , and I suddenly became jealous. Dots became connected , and further experimentation was inevitable .
That will often do it . I prefer ceramic generally for fender and silver mica for Marshall . The sozo caps work well , but so do old Lemco and RS branded caps
Charlie
-
- Posts: 4595
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
- Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.
2 others liked this
Re: Electrolytic caps and measuring them?
Different idle bias points will produce different levels of class A wattage and the change over point out of class A and into class A/B can be noticed.
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!